A bullish read, with some tension between the layers.
2nd of 81 by Bias Score
43rd of 81 by divergence
Financial Services divergence boardChanged from +88 on Oct 16
No account, no card. Add an email there for the current RGA reading with all four data layers.
Over the last 3 trading days, the score moved down 1 points, from +90 to +89.
Over the last 30 published readings, the RGA Bias Score has ranged between +70 and +90, and the reading shown above sits near the top of that range.
Every one of those readings was above zero, with no crossing in the window.
The score moved 5 points higher across the window, and the day-to-day movement has been steady.
Among the 81 Financial Services stocks we score, RGA has the 2nd highest Bias Score on this date, at +89 against a sector average of +45.
Its divergence of 32 is narrower than the sector average of 36 and narrower than the market-wide average of 43, which makes it the 39th narrowest split between data layers in the sector.
Every Financial Services Bias Score · Financial Services divergence board · Market-wide divergence
The RGA Bias Score folds four layers of market data, price structure, news sentiment, analyst ratings and fundamentals, into one reading from -100 to +100.
+100 means all four lean bullish, -100 all four bearish. A reading near 0 is either quiet or a disagreement, which is what the divergence score separates.
What feeds the score, where the data comes from and what it cannot do is set out on the methodology page. For the terms, see the glossary and frequently asked questions.
Not investment advice. A Bias Score describes market data that already exists, it does not forecast price, and past readings say nothing about future results. Trading equities carries risk and you can lose part or all of what you put in.
Produced by EquityBias, Jones Inc., CVR DK34325170, Denmark. Responsible: Nicky Jørgensen. Not supervised by a financial authority. No position held in RGA. Methodology · Interests and conflicts · RGA score history