XLC is a fund, so its Bias Score is read from price structure alone. A fund has no analyst coverage, no income statement and rarely any news of its own, so the three other readings behind a stock's score are simply not there. We keep funds scored as market and sector context, not as names to read the way a stock is read, which is why you will not find them in the dashboards, the coverage directory or a watchlist report.
The Bias Score for XLC is produced by the price-structure layer of EquityBias's scoring engine, on the same -100 to +100 scale every other score uses. For a stock that layer is one of four and the four are combined. For a fund it is the only one that applies, so the number describes what the tape is doing and nothing beyond it.
+100 means all four lean bullish, -100 all four bearish. A reading near 0 is either quiet or a disagreement, which is what the divergence score separates. With one layer reading XLC, there is nothing for it to disagree with, so its divergence score is 0 for a different reason than a stock's would be.
What feeds the score, where the data comes from and what it cannot do is set out on the methodology page. For the terms, see the glossary and frequently asked questions.
Not investment advice. A Bias Score describes market data that already exists, it does not forecast price, and past readings say nothing about future results. Trading equities carries risk and you can lose part or all of what you put in.
Produced by EquityBias, Jones Inc., CVR DK34325170, Denmark. Responsible: Nicky Jørgensen. Not supervised by a financial authority. No position held in XLC. Methodology · Interests and conflicts · XLC score history